A preliminary 3-D comparison of rapid and slow maxillary expansion in children: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study compared the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). AIM: To evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects produced by two different maxillary expansion protocols. DESIGN: Eligibility criteria included maxillary transverse deficiencies in children (mean age, 8.18 years old), randomly assigned to either RME or SME. At the outcome analysis phase, a sample of 29 subjects were analysed (RME group, N = 16 and SME group, N = 13). CBCT scans taken before expansion and 6 months later were evaluated. Five posterior and 6 anterior transverse measurements were made at different vertical levels. Treatment changes were analysed using paired t tests; independent t tests were used to compare the two groups. RESULTS: There were statistically significant (P<.05) increases in maxillary width at the skeletal, alveolar, and dental levels for both groups, with significantly smaller increases at the more superior than inferior levels. The RME group exhibited statistically larger width increases than the SME group for all measures except interorbital width, anterior alveolar process width, and intercanine width. The group differences were greater for anterior than posterior apical base widths. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid maxillary expansion produced greater orthopaedic effects than slow maxillary expansion, with the greatest effects occurring in the anterior apical base.

A 3-D evaluation of transverse dentoalveolar changes and maxillary first molar root length after rapid or slow maxillary expansion in children.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME). Maxillary permanent first molar root length and tooth movement through the alveolus were studied using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: Subjects with maxillary transverse deficiencies between 7 and 10 years of age were included. Using Haas-type expanders, children were randomly assigned to two groups: RME (19 subjects, mean age of 8.60 years) and SME (13 subjects, mean age of 8.70 years). RESULTS: Buccal cortical, buccal bone thicknesses and dentoalveolar width decreased in both groups. In the RME group the greatest decrease was related to distal bone thickness (1.26 mm), followed by mesial bone thickness (1.09 mm), alveolar width (0.57 mm), and the buccal cortical (0.19 mm). In the SME group the mesial bone thickness decreased the most (0.87 mm) and the buccal cortical decreased the least (0.22 mm). The lingual bone thickness increased in the RME and SME groups (0.56 mm and 0.42 mm, respectively). The mesial root significantly increased in the RME group (0.52 mm) and in the SME group (0.40 mm), possibly due to incomplete root apex formation at T1 (prior to installation of expanders). CONCLUSIONS: Maxillary expansion (RME and SME) does not interrupt root formation neither shows first molar apical root resorption in juvenile patients. Although slightly larger in the RME group than SME group, both activation protocols showed similar buccal bone thickness and lingual bone thickness changes, without significant difference; and RME presented similar buccal cortical bone changes to SME.

A 3-D evaluation of transverse dentoalveolar changes and maxillary first molar root length after rapid or slow maxillary expansion in children

ABSTRACT Objective: The objective of the present study was to conduct a randomized clinical trial comparing the effects of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME). Maxillary permanent first molar root length and tooth movement through the alveolus were studied using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: Subjects with maxillary transverse deficiencies between 7 and 10 years of age were included. Using Haas-type expanders, children were randomly assigned to two groups: RME (19 subjects, mean age of 8.60 years) and SME (13 subjects, mean age of 8.70 years). Results: Buccal cortical, buccal bone thicknesses and dentoalveolar width decreased in both groups. In the RME group the greatest decrease was related to distal bone thickness (1.26 mm), followed by mesial bone thickness (1.09 mm), alveolar width (0.57 mm), and the buccal cortical (0.19 mm). In the SME group the mesial bone thickness decreased the most (0.87 mm) and the buccal cortical decreased the least (0.22 mm). The lingual bone thickness increased in the RME and SME groups (0.56 mm and 0.42 mm, respectively). The mesial root significantly increased in the RME group (0.52 mm) and in the SME group (0.40 mm), possibly due to incomplete root apex formation at T1 (prior to installation of expanders). Conclusions: Maxillary expansion (RME and SME) does not interrupt root formation neither shows first molar apical root resorption in juvenile patients. Although slightly larger in the RME group than SME group, both activation protocols showed similar buccal bone thickness and lingual bone thickness changes, without significant difference; and RME presented similar buccal cortical bone changes to SME.

RESUMO Objetivo: o objetivo do presente trabalho foi realizar um estudo clínico randomizado comparando os efeitos da expansão rápida da maxila (ERM) e da expansão lenta da maxila (ELM). O comprimento radicular do primeiro molar superior permanente e o deslocamento dentro do alvéolo foram estudados por meio de imagens de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC). Métodos: pacientes com deficiência maxilar transversal e faixa etária entre 7 e 10 anos foram incluídos no estudo. As crianças foram distribuídas em dois grupos: ERM (19 indivíduos com idade média de 8,60 anos) e ELM (13 indivíduos com idade média de 8,70 anos). Em ambos os grupos foi utilizado o aparelho expansor tipo Haas. Resultados: a cortical vestibular, a espessura do osso vestibular e a largura dentoalveolar sofreram redução nos dois grupos. No grupo ERM, a maior redução foi relacionada com a espessura do osso distal (1,26 mm), seguida pela espessura do osso mesial (1,09 mm), largura alveolar (0,57 mm) e, finalmente, pela cortical vestibular (0,19 mm). Já no grupo ELM, a espessura do osso mesial apresentou maiores valores de redução (0,87 mm), enquanto a cortical vestibular teve a menor redução (0,22 mm). A espessura do osso lingual aumentou nos dois grupos, sendo 0,56 mm no grupo ERM e 0,42 mm no grupo ELM. A raiz mesial aumentou significativamente nos grupos ERM (0,52 mm) e ELM (0,40 mm) - possivelmente, em função da rizogênese incompleta ainda em T1 (antes da instalação do aparelho). Conclusões: a expansão maxilar (ERM e ELM) não interrompe a formação ou leva à reabsorção radicular nos primeiros molares permanentes de pacientes jovens. Embora discretamente maiores no grupo ERM, as modificações na espessura do osso vestibular e lingual demonstradas pelos protocolos de ativação não apresentam diferenças significativas. O grupo ERM apresentou alterações semelhantes ao grupo ELM, em relação à cortical óssea vestibular.

Evaluation of the rapid and slow maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE:: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the dental, dentoalveolar, and skeletal changes occurring right after the rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME) treatment using Haas-type expander. METHODS:: All subjects performed cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) before installation of expanders (T1) and right after screw stabilization (T2). Patients who did not follow the research parameters were excluded. The final sample resulted in 21 patients in RME group (mean age of 8.43 years) and 16 patients in SME group (mean age of 8.70 years). Based on the skewness and kurtosis statistics, the variables were judged to be normally distributed and paired t-test and student t-test were performed at significance level of 5%. RESULTS:: Intermolar angle changed significantly due to treatment and RME showed greater buccal tipping than SME. RME showed significant changes in other four measurements due to treatment: maxilla moved forward and mandible showed backward rotation and, at transversal level both skeletal and dentoalveolar showed significant changes due to maxillary expansion. SME showed significant dentoalveolar changes due to maxillary expansion. CONCLUSIONS:: Only intermolar angle showed significant difference between the two modalities of maxillary expansion with greater buccal tipping for RME. Also, RME produced skeletal maxillary expansion and SME did not. Both maxillary expansion modalities were efficient to promote transversal gain at dentoalveolar level. Sagittal and vertical measurements did not show differences between groups, but RME promoted a forward movement of the maxilla and backward rotation of the mandible.

Evaluation of the rapid and slow maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the dental, dentoalveolar, and skeletal changes occurring right after the rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME) treatment using Haas-type expander. METHODS: All subjects performed cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) before installation of expanders (T1) and right after screw stabilization (T2). Patients who did not follow the research parameters were excluded. The final sample resulted in 21 patients in RME group (mean age of 8.43 years) and 16 patients in SME group (mean age of 8.70 years). Based on the skewness and kurtosis statistics, the variables were judged to be normally distributed and paired t-test and student t-test were performed at significance level of 5%. RESULTS: Intermolar angle changed significantly due to treatment and RME showed greater buccal tipping than SME. RME showed significant changes in other four measurements due to treatment: maxilla moved forward and mandible showed backward rotation and, at transversal level both skeletal and dentoalveolar showed significant changes due to maxillary expansion. SME showed significant dentoalveolar changes due to maxillary expansion. CONCLUSIONS: Only intermolar angle showed significant difference between the two modalities of maxillary expansion with greater buccal tipping for RME. Also, RME produced skeletal maxillary expansion and SME did not. Both maxillary expansion modalities were efficient to promote transversal gain at dentoalveolar level. Sagittal and vertical measurements did not show differences between groups, but RME promoted a forward movement of the maxilla and backward rotation of the mandible.

RESUMO OBJETIVO: o objetivo do presente ensaio clínico randomizado foi avaliar as transformações dentárias, dentoalveolares e ósseas que ocorrem imediatamente após o tratamento com expansão rápida da maxila (ERM) e lenta (ELM) usando expansores do tipo Haas. MÉTODOS: todos os indivíduos foram submetidos a tomografias computadorizadas de feixe cônico (TCFC) antes da colocação dos expansores (T1) e imediatamente após a estabilização do parafuso (T2). Os pacientes que não seguiram os parâmetros da pesquisa foram excluídos. A amostra final constou de 21 pacientes no grupo ERM (idade média de 8,43 anos) e 16 no grupo ELM (idade média de 8,7 anos). Com base em estatística de assimetria e curtose, as variáveis foram consideradas de distribuição normal, e os testes t pareado e t de Student foram realizados, com nível de significância de 5%. RESULTADOS: o ângulo intermolares mudou significativamente devido ao tratamento, e o grupo ERM apresentou maior inclinação vestibular do que o grupo ELM. O grupo ERM mostrou alterações significativas em outras quatro medidas devido ao tratamento: a maxila apresentou deslocamento anterior e a mandíbula, rotação posterior; no nível transversal, houve tanto alterações ósseas quanto dentoalveolares significativas, devido à expansão maxilar. O grupo ELM apresentou alterações significativas devido à expansão maxilar. CONCLUSÕES: apenas o ângulo intermolares apresentou diferença significativa entre as duas modalidades de expansão maxilar, com maior inclinação vestibular no grupo ERM. A ERM resultou, também, em expansão maxilar óssea, ao contrário da ELM. As duas modalidades de expansão maxilar promoveram, de forma eficiente, um ganho transversal em nível dentoalveolar. As medidas sagitais e verticais não apresentaram diferenças entre os grupos, mas a ERM promoveu o deslocamento anterior da maxila e a rotação posterior da mandíbula.

Considerações sobre recessão gengival e sua resolução através da Ortodontia e Periodontia / Considerations about gingival recession and its resolution through Orthodontics and Periodontics

A recessão gengival pode ser definida como a perda de inserção do periodonto de proteção, com consequente aumento de coroa clínica e exposição radicular. Na grande maioria dos casos, fatores como acúmulo de placa bacteriana, seguido de inflamação gengival, trauma, deficiência de espessura de gengiva queratinizada e o tipo de mecânica ortodôntica empregada podem, de maneira isolada ou conjuntamente, causar ou agravar o problema. Uma vez estabelecido este quadro, resta ao ortodontista recorrer ao auxílio da terapia periodontal. Contudo, alguns detalhes, como o momento oportuno para a interação entre as terapias ortodôntica e periodontal, ainda geram dúvidas ao clínico. Desta forma, o presente artigo tem por objetivo promover a discussão sobre os fatores etiológicos da recessão gengival, bem como a validade científica, viabilidade, necessidade e o momento oportuno para emprego da terapia periodontal cirúrgica em pacientes submetidos ao tratamento ortodôntico.

Loss of insertion of periodontium followed by increased display of clinical crown and exposition of the root defines gingival recession. Factors as gingivitis, trauma, thin keratinized gingiva and the type of orthodontic mechanics, aisolated or combined may cause or increase gingival recession. Once established, the problem demands attention of orthodontists and probably requires assistance of periodontal surgical therapy. However, some details such as the timing for interaction between orthodontic and periodontal therapies still raise questions to the clinician. Thus, the purpose of this study is to discuss the etiological factors of gingival recession and the scientific value, feasibility, necessity and the convenient time for periodontal surgical therapy in orthodontic patients.

Three-dimensional assessment of buccal alveolar bone after rapid and slow maxillary expansion: a clinical trial study.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to analyze and compare the immediate effects of rapid and slow maxillary expansion protocols, accomplished by Haas-type palatal expanders activated in different frequencies of activation on the positioning of the maxillary first permanent molars and on the buccal alveolar bones of these teeth with cone-beam computerized tomography. METHODS: The sample consisted of 33 children (18 girls, 15 boys; mean age, 9 years) randomly distributed into 2 groups: rapid maxillary expansion (n = 17) and slow maxillary expansion (n = 16). Patients in the rapid maxillary expansion group received 2 turns of activation (0.4 mm) per day, and those in the slow maxillary expansion group received 2 turns of activation (0.4 mm) per week until 8 mm of expansion was achieved in both groups. Cone-beam computerized tomography images were taken before treatment and after stabilization of the jackscrews. Data were gathered through a standardized analysis of cone-beam computerized tomography images. Intragroup statistical analysis was accomplished with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test, and intergroup statistical analysis was accomplished with analysis of variance. Linear relationships, among all variables, were determined by Spearman correlation. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Both protocols caused buccal displacement of the maxillary first permanent molars, which had more bodily displacement in the slow maxillary expansion group, whereas more inclination was observed in the rapid maxillary expansion group. Vertical and horizontal bone losses were found in both groups; however, the slow maxillary expansion group had major bone loss. Periodontal modifications in both groups should be carefully considered because of the reduction of spatial resolution in the cone-beam computerized tomography examinations after stabilization of the jackscrews. Modifications in the frequency of activation of the palatal expander might influence the dental and periodontal effects of palatal expansion.

Análise da expansão rápida da maxila por meio da tomografia computadorizada Cone-Beam / Analysis of rapid maxillary expansion using Cone-Beam computed tomography

Diante do diagnóstico de uma arcada maxilar esqueleticamente atrésica, o tratamento de escolha geralmente é a expansão ortopédica da maxila, envolvendo a separação da sutura palatina mediana. A avaliação dessa sutura era basicamente realizada por meio da radiografia oclusal superior, limitando sua análise em norma frontal. Da mesma forma, quantificar essa atresia radiograficamente nas telerradiografias cefalométricas sempre foi um obstáculo para o clínico, devido à grande sobreposição das estruturas faciais. O advento da tomografia computadorizada na Odontologia tem transformado a forma de diagnóstico devido à alta precisão na avaliação das dimensões das estruturas faciais, possibilitando quantificar de maneira fiel o comportamento das hemimaxilas, a inclinação dentária, a formação óssea na sutura nos três planos do espaço, assim como a reabsorção óssea alveolar e demais consequências da expansão palatina.

Whenever a maxillary arch is diagnosed as skeletally atresic the treatment of choice is usually maxillary orthopedic expansion, involving separation of the midpalatal suture. Basically, this suture used to be assessed with the aid of a maxillary occlusal radiograph, which limited its posteroanterior evaluation. Similarly, quantifying this atresia in cephalometric x-rays always posed an obstacle for clinicians owing to considerable superimposition of facial structures. With the advent of computed tomography, this technology has revolutionized diagnostic methods in dentistry because it provides high dimensional accuracy of the facial structures and a reliable method for quantifying the behavior of the maxillary halves, tooth inclination, bone formation at the suture in the three planes of space, as well as alveolar bone resorption and other consequences of palatal expansion.